Northern Style Logo


NORTHERN STYLE NEWSHEET

IN THIS ISSUE

    THE 'IN PERSPECTIVE' REVIEWS
    'For He must rest until . . . '

    THE 'EXERGESIS' COLUMN
    'Peace . . . Peace . . . '

    'WINDS OF CHANGE'

    'Do not be conformed . . . '

Newsheets

In Perspective

` FOR HE MUST REST UNTIL HE HAS PUT ALL
HIS ENEMIES UNDER HIS FEET '


Our Bible is separated into two parts - the Old Testament and the New Testament. However it can be said, perhaps more correctly, that the Bible is one WHOLE Book and the Gospels are the watershed wherein that which was spoken of in the Old Testament is revealed in the New Testament, namely the coming of Jesus the Messiah to bring the Good News, the Gospel of the Kingdom of Heaven, to the land of Israel. But to fully understand the revelation that God has given us in Christ Jesus, both sides of the watershed need to be held in balance lest we distort the Good News which the watershed caused to be revealed. Nevertheless there is a division in the Bible and it is centered on the inauguration or initiation of the New Covenant, which was promised through the prophets Jeremiah and Ezekiel.

Our difficulty lies in keeping the Old and the New in their correct tension, yet being able to bring them together in the finished work of Jesus, for He has provided the way into the New Covenant for the nation of Israel, the ancient covenanted people of God, and all those who are gathered out of the nations by accepting Jesus as Lord and Saviour. It is only when we come to study the Scriptures with a quiet mind, and in humility accept that we do indeed, as the Apostle Paul said, `see through a darkened glass, dimly', that we shall begin to see God's purpose which He is outworking in and through His two Covenanted peoples. This removes fear and anxiety . . it removes jealousy and selfish ambition . . it allows us to see more clearly the spiritual onslaught that is being hurled against God's will and purpose, and against His beloved people, Israel and the Church.

In simple terms, if there is no Land of Israel into which He will regather His ancient people, there can be no Kingdom! If there is no Kingdom, there is no place for the King to come to rule and reign. And if there is no Bride waiting for her Bridegroom, there is no need for a Bridegroom to come to catch her away! Israel is being called back into the land to prepare for His coming as King of Israel; the Church is being called to prepare for His appearing, thus enabling her to return with Him to His Kingdom! One is a physical event with enormous spiritual blessings. The other is a spiritual event with enormous physical blessings. Both have their part in the purposes of God, which will come to pass exactly as He has purposed!

As the Body of Christ, we have a clear commission from Jesus Himself: `Go, and make disciples of all nations. ' Even earlier still Jesus told His disciples:

" And this Gospel of the Kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come. " Matthew 24:14

Then at last we shall see the purposes of God fully revealed in and through His Covenanted peoples, Israel and the Church, as they live in perfect harmony in the Kingdom of Righteousness and peace. As the Holy Spirit guides the two Covenanted peoples of God - and as they yield to His prompting - jealousy will melt. Ambitions will be yielded. Error will be repudiated. Truth will prevail, and the Kingdom of God will be seen in all its radiant glory, centered in Jerusalem in the land of Israel, where `My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one Shepherd' and `they will reign with Him upon the earth'. (Romans 11:33)

" Oh, the depth of the riches of wisdom and knowledge of God. How unsearchable are His judgements, and His paths beyond tracing out. "

~ ~ ~ ~ ~


* Extracted from our `Signpost Series No.14'. Please e-mail or telephone for a complete free copy

OUR STATEMENT OF FAITH
As disciples of the Lord Jesus we believe in:
GOD THE FATHERFather of our Lord Jesus Christ
GOD THE SONOur Saviour, Jesus Christ
GOD THE HOLY SPIRITThe Spirit of Truth
YET ONE GODTriune and Eternal

We believe that: Salvation is by grace through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ and not by works. Salvation is found in no other person. Jesus Christ, God the Son, became man, was born of a virgin from uncorrupted Seed from the Holy Spirit. He was crucified on a cross, bearing totally, once and for all time upon Himself the sins of the world. He rose from the dead by the power of God on the third day and broke the power of death. Now He lives in Glory with His Father in Heaven.

We believe in: Baptism by total immersion following repentance and receiving Jesus as Lord; the manifestation of the gifts of the Holy Spirit in the Church; the Baptism in the Holy Spirit for those who ask to receive power to fulfill our calling as followers of the Lord Jesus Christ; the Bible with its 66 Books of Scripture, in its original manuscripts, which is the total and final revelation of God's will and purpose. It is TOTALLY reliable, TOTALLY infallible, and TOTALLY self-interpreting, without error, and revealing God's total plan of salvation through His Son Jesus Christ, by the Holy Spirit.

RIGHT TO COPY
You have the right to copy, either by photocopying or electronic transmission, any of our publications or articles, on the clear understanding and agreement that NO amendments or alterations are made of such copies. This includes the title, lay-out and script. We have a spiritual reason for this which we ask you to respect.

E-mail address: info@northernstyletrust.com Tel. No. (01493) 441891 (UK)


Exergis
On March 6th 1991 the then President of the United States of America announced to the American Congress his intention to pursue four aims in the Middle East following the success of the Gulf War against Iraq.

Firstly: He intended to create new security arrangements to ensure peace and stability in the area.

Secondly: He intended to effectively stop the spread of weapons of mass destruction in the area.

Thirdly: He would work consistently towards peace between the Arab nations and Israel.

Fourthly: He believed that out of the first three aims there would emerge economic prosperity for the benefit of all the peoples in the region, and American policy would be directed towards that aim!

Taking the position that the fourth aim is dependent upon the effective outworking of the first three, we would like to examine the first three aims - and as we believe that the first two aims are dependent upon the success of the third, we will start from there.

That President may well have believed that the New World Order, and the peace that would come from it, was his highest priority. However, we believe that God has already decided His priorities, and the anvil He intends to work on is Islam - which will affect not only all the Arab nations but all who feel the yoke of that cruel oppression. God's last `hammer blow' was struck against an equally cruel yoke - and communism lies shattered and exposed for what it is. But we shall see that much more has been accomplished by this than just the release of countless millions of people who had suffered for years under communism. The powers behind those oppressive religions are already regrouping and will begin to concentrate more and more on the Middle East - at the centre of which lies Israel!

This, of course, is the ultimate object of the evil power that lies behind the unrest in the Middle East. And as the immediate object of God's purpose also concerns the nation of Israel, it is obvious that a lasting peace is something the Middle East will not experience until the conflict has been finally brought to a head. And that, we believe is what lies ahead in the immediate future! The political will of the Super- Power nations will bring about peace in the troubled area, but it will not last - the forces that are driving the Middle East countries will see to that. Undoubtably the same politics will bring about the New World Order - but it is doomed to failure. Powerful forces are at work driving the nations towards a climax, but God is in total control of it all, and out of it will indeed come forth a lasting peace - a `New World Order' of His design!

We would step back for a moment and look at the forces that are gathering for the onslaught on that which the American President mentioned in his first aim - `peace between the Arab nations and Israel'. But first we must ask, who are those Arab nations?

Living, as we do, in a limited time and geographical situation, it is all to easy to lump all the Middle East countries together under the title of `Arabs'. Yet a quick look at them will reveal their individuality, and we then begin to understand the stresses and strains that are constantly at work in those diverse nations. And with that knowledge we shall see behind them a driving force that at times almost compels them to act as one people. This will give us an understanding of the reality of the real battle that is being waged now in the Middle East. We see this principle at work in Ezekiel 28 and verses 2 and 11:

"Son of man, say to the Ruler of Tyre . . Son of man, take up this lament concerning the King of Tyre and say to him . . . "

Clearly here, within the context of this chapter, Ezekiel was talking of a natural ruler - a living, breathing person of immense wealth, who was puffed up with pride and selfish ambition - but behind this ruler there was the true ruling force, a spiritual King of Tyre - who also through pride and selfish ambition had raised himself up against God. Paul takes up this theme in his Letter to the Ephesians chapter 2, and in chapter 6 he warns us:

" Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. "

Who, then, are the Arabs! There is no easy answer to that question, and we have no desire to add to the opinions of learned anthropologists who put forward different plausible theories based on conjecture and `intelligent guesswork'. One such writer clearly expounded the views of a recognised anthropologist and scornfully dismissed the Bible records as folk legends and myths written down thousands of years after the supposed events. But Paul, recognised by even the most liberal of theologians as a learned and intelligent Hebrew, had no such problems in accepting the Word of God as it stood, and it is recorded in Acts 17 that he was debating with the most learned men of the Areopagus in Athens (a group of Epicean and Stoic philosophers) when he said: (Acts 17:22-26)

" Men of Athens! . . . . From one man He made every nation, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and He determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live. "

Genesis 10 - often referred to as `the Table of Nations' - records `the making of the nations of men . . . and the exact places where they should live'. These nations `sprang from the loins' of Noah's sons Shem, Ham and Japheth, and this chapter records the sons of the sons of Noah. From them can be traced out the records of the history of the world in broad terms, with the Indo-European nations coming from the line of Japheth. The nations of what could be called the First World Order, who dominated the early history of the world - the Egyptians, the Chinese, the South and North Americans Indians, such as the Incas, the Mayas and so forth - came from the seed of Ham. And finally, the sons of Shem, who spawned the Semite nations, such as the Hebrews, Chadeans and Assyrians.

Straight away we see that the people we generally call `Arabs' come from different roots and are a mixture of such people as the Egyptians, who dwelt in the Nile Delta, the Caananites, who were expelled from the immediate Middle East and settled in North Africa, and the Chadeans, who built the original Babylon. These all came from the line of Ham and are not Semitic in purity of race, although it would appear that there was an overriding Semitic language which identified them with the Middle East.

We have no intention of digging into the mists of anthropology in order to produce another interesting theory, but it is clear from even a limited knowledge of history that as great political and social shakings in this area occurred the desert fortress of the Arabian Peninsular became a kind of `womb', collecting a multitude of peoples who probably fled to it for refuge and then began to build a tribal life for self- protection. From time to time the `womb' became overcrowded and Arabia `expelled' groups of these nomadic people, who in the course of time would settle in the surrounding countries in and around the Fertile Crescent (as it is called) and would mould those countries into the Middle East in the form we recognise today. These migrations, occurring over thousands of years, have created what we now so casually call the `Arabs'.

The name `Arab' itself is very old: During the reign of the Assyrian King Shalmaneser 3rd in 853 BC there were records of the `Arabis', who were part of a mercenary fighting force, and the word describes the nomadic tribes who dwelt in the inland deserts of the Arabian Peninsular. The word `Arab' springs from a Semetic word `Abar' meaning simply `to wander or to pass through', and the same root word produced the word `Hebrew', which was used to describe the people of God who wandered or passed through the desert into the land promised them by God. By 550 BC the general word `Arabis' had largely been dropped, and independent nations had established themselves under the ancient names we may recall from our schooldays, with their own distinctive languages and cultures. The ancient Persians referred to the desert Peninsular as `Arabaya'. Later, the emerging Greek conquerors changed it to the more familiar `Arabia', and it has now come to describe the desert area of the whole Middle East which is peopled by various tribes and nations, all speaking a variation of the Semetic language. So much for our brief excursion into ancient history, which has been constantly added to and also made more complicated by continuous political and social upheavals - many of them coming from the `womb' of Arabia, for those swarms of nomadic people, moving upwards amd outwards, have touched and changed the `soft underbellies' of other stagnating nations through conquest.

For our own purposes we would limit our thoughts to the `expulsion from the womb' that swarmed out of Arabia with the cry `There is no god but Allah', which changed and formed so much of what we now know as the Arab world of the Middle East. In general terms we can see that today it is a cauldron of ancient animosities and hatreds, of domination and counter-domination, papered over by Pan Arabism. A greater Arab World! That which gells these nations together is not a genetic family line but a religion, the religion of Islam - or to give it its original name, Dar al Islam, which roughly translated means `the society of submission to the will of Allah' - and it is this yoke of Islam which is the power behind these nations!

Peace As we have already seen from the passage in Ezekiel 28 (the ruler of Tyre and the King of Tyre) it is a demonic driving force that no man can control, and it will gather force with more and more intensity in the few years that are left of this world's history with the objective of destroying God's people, the nation of Israel. In that sense it is not primarily an attack directed against the Jewish nation but an attack directed against God Himself, for He has made a Covenant with the nation of Israel which has to be fulfilled. But that same God who wielded the hammer that broke the oppressive yoke of communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe still has His hand firmly on the hammer that will just as surely smash the spiritual yoke of Islam and set these people free!

We are not intending to set out the history of the formation of Islam - that is well documented for any interested scholar to study - but Mohammed clearly intended it to be a unifying force to bind together the multitudes of nomadic Bedouin tribes that peopled the Arabian Peninsular. His original aim was to forge a military and political system to control and protect the camel and spice trade that flourished in the area, but during the time Mohammed was translating his thoughts into political and military action the whole area was in confusion. The Byzantine Emperor Justinian was facing the Barbarian hordes from the north, attempting to hold back the Persians in the east, and trying to stabilize the Roman part of his empire which was disintegrating. Egypt was in a ferment and Syria was a rising force in the area. All this was forcing the merchants to travel by the more difficult route through the western Arabian Peninsular to the Indian Ocean ports. Mecca now became an important centre of trade and commerce, with all the associated gods this entailed. Mohammed was, therefore, to use a modern expression, `in the right place at the right time'!

The results are now history, but the consequences of these historical facts are still with us today - and an American President decided his policy was to bring peace between these peoples! The Western mind will never understand the Arab mind, which was formed during several millennia in a hostile and changing environment such as Western man has never had to contend with. We may give assent to the thinking of the Arabs, but it is impossible to fully comprehend, and persistently keep that comprehension, in political, social and diplomatic spheres. The nomadic tribal system developed in a way which cannot be understood unless you are born into it. Nomadic tribes wandered through seemingly endless tracts of desert, always in search of food, or spoils which could be bartered to obtain food, and the motivating force was survival - survival through a close tribal system which preyed on other tribes in order to survive.

These nomadic tribes became known as `Bedouin' (meaning `raider') and this raiding custom took the Bedouin further and further afield, always looking for more food and spoils. A tribal leadership system known as Shaykhs (or to use the more westernised form, Sheikhs, or elders) evolved, and they shared leadership with a council of family heads called the `Majlis'. There was no public law, as such. The controlling `law' to keep the people in check was simply one of revenge. If someone was killed it became the duty of the next-of-kin to kill someone from the offending tribe, and if a son was killed, it was the duty of the father to kill a son from the offending tribe. Failure to do so would be to reduce the dead son to the status of a woman - considered to be inferior to a man - and if this was the case the revenge had to be taken by the next male in line.

From this we can see that not only were men considered to be superior but that there were also superior men. It therefore follows that as superior men would lead a superior family, so also, if a man would not exact revenge then he would bring shame not only upon himself but upon his whole family. This formed the basis for the culture of the nomadic tribes that peopled the Arabian Peninsular, the Arabs. It takes little intelligence, therefore, to see that their camp-fire settlements became scenes of boasting and rhetoric, which boosted the supremacy of the leaders and their families and formed much of the `heroic' self-glorifying rhetoric so beloved by Arabs today. The ranting and raving of many of the modern leaders of the Middle East is but an expression of that self-glorification which springs from the early Bedouin tribal clans. Unfortunately, rhetoric must finally give way to action in order to maintain the position of the clan. We saw this in the Gulf War - and only an Arab mind would comprehend the `logic' of it all!

In simple terms, Mohammed fused the warring Bedouin tribes together under the banner of Islam. The death of Mohammed therefore came as a shock to the new `Islamic Society' and there was danger of it breaking up once more into warring factions. The solution to this came in the form of Mohammed's father-in-law, Abu Bakr, who appointed himself Khalifah (or Caliph) which simply means `successor'. He collected the sayings of Mohammed into a book, which was further added to by his son Omar. Other material was later added by a third Caliph, Othman, and the book has since remained unchanged over the centuries. Known simply as the Quran (or Koran) it has become the focal point of the gelling force of Islam - and in those early days it became the law of the land as the Bedouins moved out of Arabia bent on conquest.

Upon the death of Mohammed many of the tribes `apostacised', but under the unifying work of Caliph Abu Bakr a military campaign was launched, known as the Ridda - the War of Apostacy - and his loyal Bedouin tribes poured out of Medina to subdue the apostate tribes throughout the Peninsular. This forged within Islam a cohesive military machine, tied to a book and driven by demonic powers which worked through their nomadic culture of constantly roving. Always looking for new spoils, their thoughts and eyes were now drawn towards the rich lands of the Fertile Crescent. This was a rich, tempting, accessible new world in which to test their new-found strength forged in the War of Apostacy, and soon the `womb' of Arabia expelled the armies of Islam into the unprepared Byzantine Empire.

Contrary to popular understanding it was not fundamentally a religious conquest, for the Bedouin eyes were upon spoils and they were outworking their raiding instincts, although now built into a military machine. Conversion came through the simple law that no tribute was extracted from those who converted to Islam, and although whole areas and countries quickly converted to avoid paying crippling tribute to the various Bedouin armies, it should be understood that conversion was not uppermost in the minds of the conquerors at that time. Nevertheless the Jews and Christians who would not convert enjoyed considerable freedom from persecution because they were a valuable source of income to the Caliph in Medina!

As the marauding Arabs ranged further afield the tribute money poured into the coffers of the Caliph and further fuelled the ambitions of his armies. But some time later, after their warrior tribes had emigrated from the Peninsular to newly- conquered lands, there evolved a religious system which followed in the wake of these armies and they began to place the yoke of Islam on countries by law, and if necessary, by death. So there now came a blurring of nationalism based upon the self-glorification of the Bedouin culture. To be a Moslem was to be an Arabi - an Arab, with all the superiority which that implied - and the convert was quick to reject all that separated him from being seen as a superior person, an Arab, victorious and superior!

With this understanding Caliph Othman began to dream of an Arabian community stretching across the whole of the Middle East, and today we would call it Pan Arabism. Many `Arab' leaders such as Colonel Nasser of Egypt have dreamed of it - and, more recently, so too has Colonel Qadhafi of Lybia. And to bring it right up to date we must mention a more recent `Caliph Othman', in the form of Saddam Hussein, for it is a well-known fact that he wanted to be known as the new Saladin!

The expansion of the Islamic world now became one of careful design rather than the previous impulsive explosion from the `womb of Arabia'. Eyes were now turned towards Persia, but although Persia was eventually thoroughly Islamised it never gave up its own culture and language. In and around 639 AD the Islamic armies overran Egypt and the whole Nile Valley, and then moved down into the rich Nile Delta, with the Byzantine Empire collapsing at Alexandra in 642 AD. With Egypt fully under their control, the armies swarmed through into North Africa, subjugating the people living there and incorporating them into their armies. The Berbers, a people similar to themselves, were to become a driving force of the Islamic armies, which would eventually move across into Europe, up through Spain and into France itself. The Berbers embraced the religion of Mohammed and became the conquering force, the storm troopers, of the Islamic armies as they were unleashed into Europe. Eyes were now turned towards Anatolia (modern Turkey) and Syria!

But these victories were not won without much internal fighting amongst the Arabs. Their history is a collection of inter-family and inter-tribal feuds, murder and revenge, which we would expect to find emerging from the deeply engraved Bedouin culture of the `law of revenge'. However, we do not have space here to begin to list the details of the bitter in-fighting and intrigue which eventually weakened the hold of the original Arabic domination of Islam. Suffice to say that through the defeat of the Ummayad clan in 750 AD the centre point of Islam moved to Baghdad and took on a distinctly oriental flavour. However, the Islamic Empire of the Abbasids had the usual cancer of revenge and counter- revenge working away within itself and it soon split into many `camps'.

The Abbasid Caliphs now employed mercenary troops from nomadic Asian tribes known as the Seljuk Turks. They used as their shock troops trained slaves known as Mamluks, who established the Seljuks as a dominant force in the Islamic world. Under the control of a weakening Abbasid Caliph the Seljuks quickly rose to power and finally poured out into the Fertile Crescent, Syria, Egypt and beyond. It was the spreading of Islamic domination that ushered in the period recorded in Western history books as `the Crusades', which were primarily a struggle between European Christians and the thrusting and expanding forces of Muslim Seljuk Turks.

At that time a new force was also appearing in the north as the Mongol tribes of Central Asia began to move south. They overran the Seljuk Empire, reaching down into Baghdad itself and bringing with them total destruction. Finally they occupied all of Persia and also reached into India. This put an end to the Crusades, and the armies of Islam withdrew to defend their lands to the south from the threatening Mongol hordes. They left Egypt, Syria and Palestine under the direct control of the Mamluk armies and their Turkish leaders, and the `womb of Arabia' gratefully received back its Bedouin `children' from these wars.

Out of these struggles and bitter conflicts there emerged another tribe which would dominate Islam and the Middle East for the next five hundred years. This tribe would spawn the Ottoman Empire! They came to prominence through a man named Osman, whose father had been granted lands in north central Anatolia by a grateful Seljuk Sultan after his help in the struggle against the Mongol tribes in 1251 AD. Osman, who embraced the religion of Islam with a fanatical zeal, extended the power and infuence of his tribe as far as Constantinople. Consequently, practically the whole area of Anatolia converted to Islam. Osman became a man of legend and fame in the Islamic world by achieving what no other dynasty could achieve. By the 14th century the boundaries of this tribe's power extended across the Dardanelles, into the Balkans and touching the southern part of Europe with Islam.

So the Ottoman Empire began the growth of what was to lie like a sickly cancer across much of the then known world for many centuries. This fusion of Oriental and Arab culture and thinking - with all the deadening corruption that it spawned - brought about a decline and stagnation in the political and social world of the Ottoman Empire and the Arab nations under their control. There, in general sweeping terms, lay the Arab dream of world conquest under the banner of Islam - until the First World War finally broke the decadent power of the Ottoman Empire and a new world emerged. In 1905 a book was published in France called `The Awakening of the Arab Nation'. Published by The Legion of the Arab Fatherland, it talked of an Arab language nation stretching from the Tigris/Euphrates Basin across Syria and Palestine and right into Egypt, all under an Arab Sultan with political and economic power. Arab nationalism was once more aroused!

With this general overview of what we call the Arab nations, we can easily see that it is not possible to give such a general title to such a multiplicity of cultures, ethnic groupings and geographical locations. Recently through the news media we have become familiar with the religious divisions of these Arab nations, and titles such as Sunni Arabs and Shi'a Arabs easily spring to mind. However, be assured that there are as many sects and diversities within Islam as there are within the Christian Church, and there is total division between these two main groupings of Islam. But with respect to them, their belief in the `rightness' of their particular sect shows more conviction in their beliefs than many Christian groupings show for theirs - but that is another subject. For Muslims, however deep the divisions between the sects of Islam, one thing holds them together - the Koran, the writings of Mohammed. Wherever Islam takes a hold on a country, the law of the Koran prevails and it reaches out its tentacles into every sphere of life, and from the mouth of Mohammed himself it is stated that the world has clearly divided between Dar al Islam (the land of Islam, and those who hold to its teachings) and Dar al Harb (the lands of war, and those who do not). These titles speak for themselves, and they reveal the state of the Islamic world - a state of war!

Space alone dictates that much of this study is written in general terms, and with such a complex history - much of it unrecorded as literature - a more detailed account demands to be written by a more scholarly approach than we can give. But enough information has been given to show that the original Arabs were nomadic clans and tribes who had drifted into the `womb' of the deserts of the Arabian Peninisular and that through the direction and inspiration of Mohammed a cohesive collection of people had been brought into being, and after his death the successive struggles and the War of Apostacy forged great mercenary armies which swarmed out, conquering all who stood in their path. Today in the Arabian Peninsular Islam is practiced very much as it was in those early days. Centered around the Koran, and having the guardianship of the so-called holy places, Islam has produced a nation of extreme conservatism which is the protector of the purity of Islam.

However, the Islamic `Arab' nations of the north are entirely different. For as the original mass movement of the Arab armies moved out from Arabia they spread across the whole of the Middle East, reaching into much of Spain and France, across into Persia and on into the soft under-belly of the Asiatic lands, and through the centuries the original purity of the Arabic movement was left behind. Control of this vast empire moved to Baghdad around the Abbasids, and for centuries this was the centre of the Islamic world and its so-called Golden Age. If we care to dig into our childhood and youthful memories we will soon see how much of this Golden Age we have come into contact with - `Ali Baba', `The Thief of Baghdad', `One Thousand and One Nights' and so on - all beloved by Hollywood and novelists alike as they drew upon the Golden Age of the Abbasid Empire for inspiraton.

It was during this period that the Arab world experienced its own `great awakening' - developing its own distinctive architecture, its own concept of Islamic law (and the literature and philosophy that came from it) - long before the European `awakening' which we call the Renaissance. But this world was destroyed by the invading Mongols from the Asiatic lands, and Islam and the Arab world finally passed into the hands of the Ottomans whose empire was ruled by totally despotic Turkish Sultans. We saw that Islam was now spread across the whole Middle East and that for 500 years the whole area slowly but surely became a stagnant back-water in world affairs. Culturally they were a united people under the Ottoman Empire, but collectively they were corrupt, disintegrating both morally and economically. The fusing together of the original Arabi Bedouin with the guile of the oriental Persians, the Turks and the Asiatic Mongols produced an empire which would surely fall apart!

With the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1918-1919 it seemed that at last the yoke might be broken but, as we have already recorded, in 1905 there had been planted the seed of a dream of a resurrected Pan Arab world - a re- emergence of the Golden Age of Islam! But the conquering Western nations laid that dream to rest, and what we know as the Arab nations of today is the result of a carving up of the old Ottoman Empire ready for Western exploitation. The main culprits were obviously Britain, France and Italy, but most of the countries of the West had their political fingers in the Middle East pie. They used the ambitions of petty Sheikhs and Emirs who were waiting to settle old scores - part of the Arab life-blood - to establish Western power in the whole region. But these new states were highly unstable and volatile and after the Second World War they were uncontrollable!

Finally, with the forming of the State of Israel in 1948 through the United Nations, the whole area became a seething cauldron of bitter rivalry and ready for war!

Israel was merely in the way! and it became a catalyst for war by the re- emerging Arab Nationalism with its dreams of a Pan Arabia stretching over the whole area. There was a fusion of nationalism and religion over the whole of the Middle East - a dream of a new Islamic Golden Age. We have seen before that a fusion of state and religion brings into play a powerful force, and behind that powerful force stands the `King of Tyre' who will urge the `Ruler of Tyre' on and into a New Age of World Domination. This is at the heart of the battle now being drawn together in the Middle East!

The Western world saw it in the rise of Colonel Nasser in the 1960's. His was a dream of Egypt (and of a particular Egyptian called Nasser!) leading a Pan Arabian Renaissance which would last for ever. It was not to be! We saw it again with Colonel al Qadhafi. We might think he looked slightly ridiculous in his flowing robes, sitting in his Beduoin tent in the desert. He might well be a Berber, but he dreams of the simplicity and purity of the original Arab - the nomadic tribesmen who lived by the principle of `first among equals' with the boasting and rhetoric that leads to action. Do not think of the late Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran as merely an evil man who plotted behind his dark beard. His dream was of the Renaissance of Islam, based on power in Iran (or maybe he preferred to call it Persia).

Saddam Hussein is not totally a madman for he too is driven by the Pan Arabian dream. One of the titles he has chosen for himself is Saladin, the legendary hero of the Abbasid Empire who defeated the armies of Europe, the Crusaders, with his Mamluk armies. Saddam Hussein's choice of name is even more strange for Saladin was a Kurd - the very people this modern-day Saladin turned against in his defeat by the new `Crusaders' led by America! But in the midst of all this noise and rhetoric, the bombs and assassin's bullets, there was another who dreamed of a Pan Arabian world. (Strangely, the word `assassin' comes from an extreme Islamic sect whom the Crusaders feared, and for over two centuries they were the terrorists of the eastern world.)

The late President Lt. General Hafez al Assad also had his dreams of a Greater Syria based on Damascus. Most of the regimes of northern Arabia are secular in their political and social practices and the religion of Islam is subservient and secondary to their nationalistic ambitions. To give this philosophy a title we could perhaps call it Islamic Socialism, and this is best illustrated in the political creed of the Ba'th party which still rules with an iron fist in Syria and Iraq.

Into this sticky mire in 1991 stepped an American President with his dream of a New World Order and his four stated aims, one of which was peace between the Arab nations and Israel. The Gulf War was the means of drawing America into the steaming cauldron of the Middle East, but many had urged that President to make a clean exit. This was his avowed intent, but other forces ensured that he could not pull out of this area or of the Middle East as quickly as he would have wished. Even the most naive person knew that the Gulf War was not really about the invasion of Kuwait - not even necessarily about oil - but it was to do with power politics and the Western fear of the Pan Arabian dream coming to pass under Saddam Hussein.

The dream of another World Order, under the control (direction) of the West, was under threat, and with another political giant (the Old Soviet Union) undergoing death throes no-one could even begin, at that time, to give an accurate assessment of the outcome. And it must not be forgotten that large parts of the disintegrating former Soviet Union were Islamic in religion and culture, their borders resting up against Turkey and Iran. Who in America, or, for that matter, in the West, could have forecast what would happen to the world system if there was a victorious `Saladin' with Pan Arabian leadership dreams?

It had to be stopped! It was . . . at least for the time being! What, then, has happened? One thing is certain. With the end of the Gulf War the same old players were still in power, but their world had changed! There was no love lost between the Arab nations of the north and those of the southern half. Both had dreams and aspirations of leading the Islamic world. Saudi Arabia - keepers of the purity of Islam and guardians of the holy places - still dreamed of a new Golden Age, but to the side of them was the menacing power of Iran. Suddenly the dream of a Pan Arabian Empire was shattered. The falling pieces showed up deep divisions and bitterness, and the Gulf War alliance of Arab armies was seen to be no more than a settling of old scores - the blood feuding of the `Beduoin Arabs'.

This said, there will be no forgetting the treachery of Arab nations who aligned themselves with `the Great Satan', principally identified as America. According to Arab culture, treachery must be dealt with. Not to deal with the problem would bring discredit, not only to the leaders of the `tribe' but also to the family members. Great shame will be the portion of the nation that does not respond. This does not spell peace in anyone's dictionary! At that time, and quietly working in all of this, was the late President Assad of Syria - quietly, ruthlessly and efficiently seeking to extend his dream of a Greater Syria. He would have seen the waning influence of his previous benefactor, the old Soviet Union, and he bided his time - which came with the Gulf War. He then deftly moved his camp to the West, and as a reward he received $2 billion, which he promptly spent on armanents. This must surely call into question the American President's aim of controlling arms in the Middle East!

What does this all point to? Certainly not to a lasting peace! The forces that are waiting and watching with malevolent eyes will not stop until they once more attempt their objective - the destruction of the Jewish people. Christians in the West have become so preoccupied with their own part of the world, and fed on a diet of end-time prophecy concerning the shaking of the monetary system and the rise of the Antichrist that they have perhaps forgotten that there are other prophecies that must first be fulfilled. It has become a favourite `pastime' to try to identify the latest Antichrist, with such people as Henry Kissenger, Nelson Rockefeller, and, more recently, Mikhail Gorbachev, being identified. (Does Tony Blair now qualify?) But we need to take our eyes off our own narrow opinions for we have fallen into the trap of believing that the world consists only of the West, and we need to see the larger canvas on which God is painting His picture. This might not agree with our end-time doctrine which is based on videos and tapes from the latest Christian `Guru', but we could fall into the trap - through a dangerous deception of the enemy, who has worked on our westernised `McDonald's Fast Food' appetite for instant sensationalism - of listening to the news or watching the latest video and making the Bible fit into a timetable which the media has created.

There is no doubt that the West is experiencing a shaking, for the Babylonian system has to fall, politically, economically and religiously, *  is clearly foretold in the Bible. There is no doubt that the Antichrist will arise. That also is clearly foretold! There is no doubt that the False Prophet (a religious leader of an apostate religious system) will be clearly seen. Yes, the 10 horns, or kings, of Daniel 7 will emerge. But do not be surprised if they are not the European Community (and Jacques Delors was not the Antichrist, which will upset some Christian `Gurus' who expound current affairs as prophecy). The European Community is rapidly changing shape, and just as the danger of Pan Arabism was flattened (albeit temporarily) by the Gulf War, we now read of splits appearing (perhaps just as temporarily) in the member states of the European Community.

We can only know that prophecy has been fulfilled when it has happened exactly as foretold in every detail. Guessing will not bring about fulfillment. We are told to watch and pray . . to test and enquire . . to wait and be patient . . for what God has spoken will surely come to pass! God is painting on a very large canvas indeed, and we need to observe with eyes wide open in order to see what He is doing so that we can align ourselves with His will and purposes. Through prayer and intercession we can reach through international boundaries . . move against enemy armies . . have victory over spiritual forces . . and work together with God in the harvest field where He has placed us (if we know His will - and that is revealed in the Bible and by the Holy Spirit).

It would seem probable that the next major prophecy to be fulfilled will take place in the Middle East. This is usually described as `the wars of Ezekiel 38 and 39'. God is certainly bringing His people home to the land of Israel where He will bring them to Himself through affliction. The Bible refers to this time as `The Day of Jacob's Trouble', `The Day of the Lord', and other such titles, and these events will almost certainly be fulfilled through what is known as the Great Tribulation. However, the events of Ezekiel 38 and 39 would appear to take place prior to these terrible days, and the scenario which is now being brought together in the Middle East would seem to point to these wars and not to the war of Armageddon, which is recorded in Revelation 16:16.

The words the Lord spoke to Ezekiel are clear and tell of armies from Persia, Cush, Put, Gomer, Beth Togarmah, and many other nations gathering against Israel. The principle one of these is `Gog, chief prince of Meshek and Tubal', who is brought from the far north, coming to wage war against Israel, invading `a land of unwalled villages and a peaceful and unsuspecting people, all of them being without walls and gates and bars'. These nations are clearly identified as being Islamic nations and part of the Arab world. Gomer is usually thought to be northern Germany, which could head up a European army, whereas the main force is Russia, which at present has some highly volatile and unstable Islamic Republics on its southern borders.

But whilst we in the West have been preoccupied with the coming `money crash' - believing that every dip in the price of houses is a clear sign of its imminent arrival - another part of the canvas has been painted in by God. The `tribes' of the Greater Arabian womb were in dismay at the defeat of their latest `prophet' at the end of the Gulf War and reverted back to old-fashioned nationalism and the settling of old scores. Could it be that God is using the ambition of a former President of the United States of America to bring about peace in the Middle East between Israel and the Arabs - a real peace, according to man's understanding, which will bring prosperity and wealth to the people - a New World Order guaranteed by Western countries and the United Nations of a kind that will allow Israel to dwell in cities without walls?

We shall know when it happens! If it does come about then rest assured that what follows will be the complete fulfillment of Ezekiel's prophecy! One day soon some latter-day `Saladin', with a dream of Pan Arabism, could utter the cry that will fuse the Arab nations into one people under the banner of Islam. Russia will be reluctantly drawn into it; Gomer will be there too; and another war will be under way. But in its way will be Israel, with the Jews who have been gathered back into the land ready for God's dealings with them! It would seem possible, therefore, that `on the mountains of Israel' God will break the evil yoke of Islam just as surely as the yoke of Communism has been broken over the Eastern European nations.

In the aftermath, unnumbered multitudes of Arabs will be set free to hear the Good News of the love of God! So understanding the background of these people, instead of lumping them all together under the general title of `Arabs', will help our understanding of the purposes of God and of how He can work in the circumstances. And even a slight understanding of the complexities of the Arab world, such as we have attempted here, will enable us to lift up our eyes to see the `bigness of our God', who is reaching out in every possible way to draw people to Himself whilst there is time before the Lord Jesus returns!

~ ~ ~ ~ ~



Winds

` Do not be conformed to the world . . . but be transformed . . .'


The expression `out of step' triggers off different reactions in people depending upon their experiences. Those of a military persuasion may relive an hour of remembering what happened at a military parade, whereas those of a religious persuasion might possibly read on believing this to be yet another doom-laden message warning Christians against `marching with the world'. Two persuasions! Two distinctly different outlooks on life! Can they - indeed, should they - be reconciled? And within Christian communities there are also two seemingly opposing viewpoints concerning relationships with `the world'. On the one hand, those with their continual `marching to take the land' believe they are releasing a creative spiritual awareness, transforming the world through the Church and making all things ready for the return of Jesus. The other persuasion, however, shuns the world and seeks to enter into `the Most Holy Place', awaiting the return of the Lord Jesus to deliver them from evil.

There are, of course, variations of these views, although they are but variations on a theme. Clearly, then, within Christian communities these two major persuasions seem to be out of step. So how is it possible to reconcile such totally opposing viewpoints? Thankfully we have the Scriptures to give us the answer, and in particular the Old Testament reveals the joy and pleasure with which God's people enjoyed what He had created. In doing so they saw reflected in the beauty of His creation the glory of the LORD, who had called them and made them His own treasured possession. There is the ever- present danger of Gnosticism, which treats all physical matter as unclean, but there is also the twin danger of over-assertive triumphalism which sees a future golden era as the Church transforms the world.

With that introduction we shall let the Scriptures speak for themselves! The story in Genesis of the creation of the world, as we know it, tells us that `God saw that it was good'. We also know that the creation story came before the rebellion in the Garden of Eden, and the results of that rebellion are evident in the world through a process of death and new life in the seasons and times. And yet although His creation now bears the evidence of that rebellion it did not stop that which God had created from being good. The Scriptures declare it to all who would see the glory of the LORD, but still, for man in this age, the burden will remain that `the ground will produce thistles and thorns for you'.

Of all the Scriptures, perhaps it is in the Psalms that we catch sight of the `goodness' of what God had created:

Psalm 96:10-13
" Say among the nations: `The LORD reigns'. The world is firmly established, it cannot be moved; He will judge the peoples with equity. Let the heavens rejoice, let the earth be glad; let the sea resound, and all that is in it; let the fields be jubliant, and everything in them. Then all the trees of the forest will sing for joy; they will sing before the LORD, for He comes, He comes to judge the earth. He will judge the world in righteousness and the people in His truth. "

In such a Psalm as this there is a sense of the beauty and goodness of God's creation, which reflects His glory and righteousness, and it is impossible to read through Psalm 104 and not catch a sense of the beauty of the LORD reflected in what He has created:

" Praise the LORD, O my soul! O LORD my God, You are very great; You are clothed with splendour and majesty. He wraps Himself in light as with a garment; He stretches out the heavens like a tent and lays the beam of His upper chambers on their waters . . . He makes springs pour water into the ravines . . . He makes grass grow for the cattle, and plants for man to cultivate . . . wine that gladdens the heart of man and oil to make his face shine . . . The moon marks off the seasons, and the sun knows when to go down . . . How many are Your works, O LORD! In wisdom You made them all; the earth is full of Your creatures. There is the sea, vast and spacious, teeming with creatures beyond number - living things both large and small . . . I will sing to the LORD all my life; I will sing praises to my God as long as I live . . . "

But even earlier than these `Songs of David' we read in the Book of Deuteronomy of God's goodness towards His chosen people as they were about to enter their Land of Promise: (8:7-9)

" For the LORD your God is bringing you into a good land - a land with streams and pools of water, with springs flowing in the valleys and hills; a land with wheat and barley, vines and fig-trees, pomegranates, olive oil and honey; a land where bread will not be scarce and you will lack nothing; a land where the rocks are iron and you can dig copper out of the hills. "

God's love for His people Israel is revealed in His total provision for all their needs - a land of goodness and plenty where they would lack nothing! However, in the next verse we find a warning of how easy it is to get `out of step':

Versus 10-11
" When you have eaten and are satisfied, praise the LORD your God for the good land He has given you. Be careful that you do not forget the LORD your God, failing to observe His commands, His laws and His decrees that I am giving you this day. "

God saw that all He had made was good - and He offers this goodness and beauty to those formed in His image for them to enjoy. Not to enjoy it, or to fail to care for it and preserve it, comes very close to rejecting the God who gives all good things to His people. But if we do `keep in step' with His purposes we shall find that His goodness in His creation flows over to His people in rich abundance and reflects His glory. In our eagerness to dig into the rich veins of Scripture for more gold, there is always the danger of looking for spiritual types and shadows and ignoring the simple fact that what God has created is good. It is for our enjoyment and is to be seen as a reflection of His glory. The prophets who followed on from those who entered the land of Canaan had no difficulty with such matters, and the Scriptures are full of their praise of the goodness of God in His creation.

The earlier chapters of the Book of Ezekiel are perhaps one of the last places where you would expect to go in order to see the beauty of God's creation, filled as they are with lamentations and warnings of judgement! But in the opening verses of chapter 31, where there is a prophecy concerning the downfall of Pharaoh king of Egypt, Ezekiel compares Pharaoh and Assyria to the majesty and glory of `a cedar in Lebanon with beautiful branches':

Ezekiel 31:2-9
" Son of man, say to Pharaoh king of Egypt and to his hordes: `Who can be compared with you in majesty? Consider Assyria, once a cedar in Lebanon, with beautiful branches overshadowing the forest; it towered high, its top above the thick foliage. The waters nourished it; deep springs made it grow tall, their streams flowed all around its base and sent their channels to all the trees of the field. So it towered higher than all the trees of the field; its boughs increased and its branches grew long, spreading because of the abundant waters. All the birds of the air nested in its branches; all the great nations lived in its shade. It was majestic in beauty, with its spreading boughs, because its roots went down to abundant waters. The cedars in the Garden of God could not rival it, nor could the pine trees equal its boughs, nor could the plane trees compare with its branches - no tree in the Garden of God could match its beauty. I made it beautiful with abundant branches, the envy of all the trees of Eden in the Garden of God. "

As we might expect from the Book of Isaiah, the prince of prophets, he constantly declares that the glory of the LORD is seen in His creation:

Isaiah 45:18
" For this is what the LORD says - He who created the heavens, He is God; He who fashioned and made the earth, He founded it; He did not create it to be empty, but formed it to be inhabited - He says: `I am the LORD, and there is no other'. "

Again earlier in chapter 35 where Isaiah is prophesying concerning the return of the people of Israel to their land, we can almost hear the land singing a joyful song as it `holds out' the beauty of its fruit to the returning redeemed people of God:

Isaiah 35:1-2
" The desert and the parched land will be glad; the wilderness will rejoice and blossom. Like the crocus it will burst into bloom; it will rejoice greatly and shout for joy. The glory of Lebanon will be given to it, the splendour of Carmel and Sharon; they will see the glory of the LORD, the splendour of our God. "

There is no need to spiritualize such passages of Scripture for here the great beauty of God's creation bursts out, reflecting the glory of God. Neither do we need to dwell only upon the majestic beauty which Isaiah records, for there is also great tenderness displayed in God's creation, as beautifully recorded by Hosea:

Hosea 14:5-8
I will be like the dew to Israel; he will blossom like a lily. Like a cedar of Lebanon he will send down his roots; his young shoots will grow. His splendour will be like an olive tree, his fragrance like a cedar of Lebanon. Men will dwell again in his shade. He will flourish like the corn. He will blossom like a vine, and his fame will be like the wine of Lebanon."

And who can fail to see the tender love and the passionate jealousy that God feels for His creation when reading through chapters 38 and 39 of the Book of Job? Now extending His love towards other parts of His creation the LORD thunders out His jealous love:

Chapter 38: 2:4:6:7:23:31:37
" Who is this who darkens My counsel with words without knowledge . . . Where were you when I laid the earth's foundations? Tell Me, if you understand . . . On what were its footings set or who laid its cornerstone - while the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy . . . Does the rain have a father? Who fathers the drops of dew? . . Can you bind the beautiful Pleiades? Can you loose the cords of Orion . . . Who has the wisdom to count the clouds? Who can tip over the water jars of the heavens? "

Chapter 39: 1:13:19:27:
" Do you know when the mountain goats give birth? Do you watch when the doe bears her fawn . . . The wings of the ostrich flap joyfully, but they cannot compare with the pinions and feathers of the stork . . . Do you give the horse his strength or clothe his neck with a flowing mane . . . Does an eagle soar at your command and build his nest on high. "

We could continue to record the glory of God's creation - created for His purposes and to bring goodness and pleasure to man who is formed in His likeness - and in the enjoyment of all that He has given us we are enjoined to see and to ponder upon the glory and majesty of God. The New Testament writings do not contain the same acclamation of the glory of God as seen in His creation for they have a different purpose, which is to proclaim the glory of God's love revealed in Christ Jesus. But we need to keep firmly in our minds that the men who so faithfully wrote the books of the New Testament `as they were moved by the Holy Spirit' were steeped in knowledge of the Hebrew Scriptures. Not only had they seen the glory of His creation but they proclaimed `to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son, Jesus Christ' (1 John 1:3).

Yet we know from Paul's Letter to the Romans that he too had a clear and unmistakeable love for all of God's creation, for he wrote:

Romans 1:20
" For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities - His eternal power and divine nature - have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. "

As he continues his letter Paul picks up this sense of the beauty of God's creation as he looks forward to the fulfillment of God's purposes:

Romans 8:19-21
" The creation waits in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed. For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the One who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the glorious freedom of the children of God. "

Paul had seen that even nature has been made `subjected to frustration' by God, so that even in his fallen state man would still have some form of dominion over nature which, in a real sense, is waiting `in eager expectation' for the Fulness to come! And as Paul was writing these words he would surely have had in mind the writings of the prophet Isaiah:

Isaiah 65: 17-25 in part
" Behold, I will create a new heaven and a new earth . . . never again will there be in it an infant that lives but a few days . . They will build houses and dwell in them; . . . They will plant vineyards and eat their fruit . . . The wolf and the lamb will feed together, and the lion will eat straw like an ox . . . "

Yet we need to pay attention to the words of John, which are equally clear:

1 John 2:15-17
" Do not love the world or anything in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For everything in the world . . . comes not from the Father but from the world. The world and its desires pass away, but the man who does the will of God lives for ever. "

It is at this point that we need to define our understanding between what God has created, as an expression, a reflection of who He is, and the Biblical understanding of the world which in its fallen state is the permitted domain of strong dark spiritual powers under the authority of a powerful fallen cherub, Lucifer (or Satan). This `world system' is in direct hostility to God, headed by the great Usurper who outworks his rebellion through worldly powers and systems. It is at precisely this point that as Christians listen to the different `music' of the world they become out of balance - out of step with each other - with the danger of sectarianism rearing its ugly head.

Herein lies the danger for God's redeemed spiritual people as they live in a human material world: How can they enjoy God's creation, which is a reflection of who He is, without conforming to the world - which, spiritually, is under the control of Satan who is seeking to establish his kingdom, a kingdom in which he is king? The Scriptures are clear that all of God's creation is to be enjoyed to the full, for it reflects His goodness and glory. Equally, we are enjoined not to love the world. This is no paradox! It is a clear separation for God's people in their spirits, their minds and their lives, which they constantly have to address as they journey on in order to keep in step with God's Word and with each other.

We would suggest that in the 1960's there occurred a massive cultural shift in the Western nations, taking them deeper into the world system that Satan seeks to establish under his direct authority. Obviously this did not happen suddenly, for the forces that produced this shift had been steadily working away for a long period, but at a given point in time it was revealed in its historical setting. But once `sighted' it led to a polarization within the Christian communities which live out their spiritual lives in a physical realm. Over the long centuries (certainly for two thousand years) these events have occurred regularly. Historically we give them names and neatly fit them into our `Church History Library' - such names as the Renaissance; the Reformation; the Enlightenment; Marxism; and once labelled they sit upon the `historical shelves'.

But these, and many other movements, need to be placed within a wider timescale than usual in order to understand more fully the passage of history. Certainly these cultural shifts that have occurred over the past two thousand years have been seen predominantly in the West, but spreading out in ever-increasing ripples until they have touched the four corners of the earth. Of course there has to be a spiritual basis for this (and it can be found in Genesis 10) but as this is not our subject here we need to return to the 1960's. From that period on there has indeed been a significant cultural shift, which we can only name as `aggressive secularization', and it is that cultural shift of the 1960's which has caused Christians to become out of step with God and with one another!

In one way there has been a major shift back into a modern-day form of monasticism, seen in the countless numbers of `holiness groups' emerging with their dire warnings of judgement upon those who dare to embrace `the world and its evil'. But the major part of the Christian community has seemingly entered into the world with the same decisive determination as those who seek to withdraw from it. Their beliefs have been given scornful, and often judgemental, titles such as `Social Gospel'; Liberation Theology'; and more lately, `Dominion Now or Triumphalism'. These came about as a large section of the Christian community became aware of the distress of countless millions of people through economic manipulation and the wholesale destruction of natural resources. They sought to correct the mad onrush of Western culture by countless marches across lands and continents; with repentance and a claiming back of the land; having overtaken the early `social gospellers'.

This has caused an even deeper entrenchment of those of the monastic persuasion, leaving, as we have said, the Christian community clearly out of step with God and with each other. Both, we would suggest, have been inflamed by `the spirit of the age' which broke out into the open in the 1960's and, as a certain Bishop Ing once said: `A Church that marries the `spirit of the age' in one age will find itself a widow in the next'. We have called that spirit `aggressive secularization', and in our closing thoughts we shall look at how this has occurred so that we `do not conform to the world'. Instead, by `being transformed in our minds' we may play our part within the Body of Christ and walk in step as we travel on the last lap of our journey in this Dispensation of Grace.

In general terms it seems reasonable to say that prior to the world wars in the first half of the 1960's, there was in the Western culture a finely tuned balance between `State and Church'. Unfortunately this has led to the unscriptural belief that nations embracing Western culture are generally considered to be `Christian', with the remainder of the world `unchristian' and needing to be evangelised with `Christianised commercialism'. But let us leave that disturbing thought to one side! The Western culture prior to the 1960's could be said to be based on the twin pillars of Christian religion and secular State. And within that society generally there was an acceptance of God - an acknowledgement that the stability of the world was held in the hands of a God who cares and directly intervenes in human affairs. Its culture was built upon the principles and decrees revealed in the Judaeo/Christian traditions, as seen in the Bible and passed down through countless generations.

During the 1960's the deadly poison of the philosophies of the previous century burst out, resulting in a wave of secular Humanism such as had not been seen in previous generations - and Western culture moved onto another track in an attempt to find total fulfillment within itself, without the need of a God who reminded mankind of its mortality. Therefore what we see now outworking itself is but the result that has come from that move onto the `single track' of Humanism, which now has no corrective Christian `pillar' to stop its headlong dash to destruction. The news media identifies it in part, calling it `the breakdown of family values'. Politicians, alarmed by it, called for `a Citizen's Charter' and stress the need for people to take personal responsibility! But the removal of the need for God from the Western culture and physche ensures that any effort to correct these problems will result in further secularization of society.

Now to move from the general to the particular: We have no need to list the statistics on marriage breakdown. In an earlier generation marriage was seen to be a life-long committment, reflecting the relationship that God wants with those created in His image. The patriarchial family, where there was respect for the parents and a reciprocal caring and responsibility for the children, was seen as a reflection of a God who provides all good things to enjoy and who has accepted responsibility for those He cares for. Sexuality, designed to be enjoyed in a marriage relationship alone, was seen as the reflection of the deep, intimate relationship that God longs to draw all people into through Jesus, His Son. Care and respect for the creation was an acknowledgement of a God who provided everything for our daily needs. Just laws, based on Judaeo/Christian concepts, reflected a God whose righteousness and justice kept the world in order and balance. In short, as the community enjoyed all the fulness of a stable, secure and abundant good life, it was an acknowledgement of a God who was personally and intimately involved in that community's affairs. This was the fusion of Christian and secular thinking which existed in a general form up to the 1960's.

We need only briefly mention what has happened since the Christian `pillar' upholding society was removed - and its removal has resulted in the removal of the need of its God also! Today marriage is generally seen as a matter of inconvenience if it stops individuals expressing themselves, and it becomes a hindrance should the need of another better relationship come along. When this happens the patriarchial family disappears and the family is left to look after its own interests, passing responsibility on to the `caring professionals'. Sexuality becomes a matter of personal choice, with preferred partners according to the individual's preference. Care and respect for the creation is relegated to the need to at least maintain the status quo, and exploitation and corruption follow on! It takes little intelligence to see that Western culture has abandoned the twin track of Christianity and the secular State in favour of a thoroughly secularized single track. Its destruction is therefore sure and certain!

This, we would suggest, is the prime reason for this polarization within the Christian communities, causing them to march out of step with each other. One section, in its alarm, has moved into a contemporary form of monasticism; the other, in its desire to reclaim society for God, has so thoroughly identified itself with that society that it has passed onto the single track of Humanism. And both sections have stopped seeing that the physical world in which they are called to live out their spiritual lives reflects the goodness of God, who has provided everything for our enjoyment as we acknowledge whom He is.

For the `monastic' part of the Christian community there is a need to recognise that God has provided the goodness and beauty of the earth, the abundance of all things, as a reflection of whom He is, and as we enjoy them we can `enjoy' Him as a loving Father who cares for our enjoyment of His total provision. The fulness of the Gospel needs to be taken back into society so that people will begin again to acknowledge God. Monasticism is surely a revulsion against the misuse of creation, but it contains within itself its own particular seed of secularism as it begins to live in its own self-righteousness and closes the door to the full enjoyment of God and what He has provided.

For the other section of the Christian community, there is a need for it to recognise that it is in danger of replacing God by its own efforts to pacify and restore a world made ready for the return of Jesus. A social gospel which does not reflect God is no gospel! A triumphalist Church which is enjoying its blessings and satisfying its every need is no more than a secularized religious body and has moved on to the single track of world pleasures and experiences. But as we draw these thoughts to a close we would turn again to the Scriptures and search out a Scripturally based answer to the polarization that has occurred within the Christian community as it has seemingly broken off from its task of being `the salt of the earth and a light on a hill'. Paul exhorts his beloved Philippians:

Philippians 2:9-16a
" Therefore, God exhalted Him (Jesus) to the highest place and gave Him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of the Father. Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed - not only in my presence but now much more in my absence - continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you to will and to act, according to His good purpose. Do everything without complaining or arguing, so that you may become blameless and pure, children of God without fault in a crooked and depraved generation, in which you shine like the stars in the universe as you hold out the word of life . . . . "

In this glorious song of praise to God, who became flesh and dwelt among us in order to reconcile us to God through His sacrifice, we see in verse 9 God's desire that all men would accept and honour the total expression of His love - `that every knee should bow' and acknowledge Jesus as Lord and Saviour. It is on such Scriptures as this that the twin pillars of Western civilization have been built, and it is this same desire of all Christians, that Jesus be honoured, which has caused them to walk out of step with each other. One part, in alarm, has turned in on itself and denied itself the full enjoyment of God. The other part, in the same alarm, has reached out with aggressive assertiveness to claim the world for Him. There is, however, the suggestion in verse 9 that although every knee should bow to Jesus, not every knee will bow to Him in this Dispensation.

We do not know how far the night is spent, but if the shadows lengthen still more then never again in this age will the world as we know it be based upon the twin pillars of Christian religion and secular State! Indeed, the Scriptures warn us of such a time as we are beginning to experience coming upon the whole world, and although Paul writes with a certainty of an age to come when every knee shall bow to Jesus, he also continues to encourage the Philippians that as they wait for that day they will continue: ` to do everything without complaining or arguing, so that you may become blameless and pure, children of God without fault in a crooked and depraved generation, in which you shine like stars as you hold out the word of life'. He talks of a `depraved generation', not of a depraved world of created beauty! He talks of a generation which has denied the need of a God who has provided everything for our enjoyment as a reflection of His total love for His creation.

But in the midst of that depraved generation we are entreated to shine like the stars in the universe as we hold out the word of life. There is no suggestion of monasticism in these words - but neither is there any hint of dominant triumphalism. We are called to be a living witness, a reflection of a God who cares, who loves, who has made every provision for us, spiritually, emotionally and physically. As we live out our lives in a physical material realm it is a cold and pitiless God we offer if it does not include the fulness of a God who loves, cares and provides as a reflection of His total nature. Equally, it is a secularized gospel we offer if it meets only our physical and sensual needs. And neither of the gospels we mention will reveal us as stars shining in the universe to a depraved generation as a reflection of a righteous, holy and compassionate God, who entered the world as Jesus to draw us into the full abundance of His love. To do less than enjoy His fulness is to deny Him, but to do more would equally deny that He alone will usher in the fulness of His Kingdom, in which every knee will indeed bow before Him and every tongue confess Him as Lord.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~


* * * * * * * *


Return